legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.B. CA2/1
The subjects of this appeal are R.B., Jr. (born January 2015) and S.R. (born December 2016). Appellant R.B. (Father) is the children’s presumed father; the children’s mother, C.R. (the mother), is not a party to this appeal. The juvenile court sustained allegations that Father and the mother engaged in domestic violence in R.B., Jr.’s presence, and declared both children dependents pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) , and (b)(1). Father does not challenge the court’s finding under section 300, subdivision (b)(1), that he was negligent in not protecting his children, but does challenge the finding under section 300, subdivision (a), that he intentionally harmed them. Father contends “[w]hat the evidence does not show, and something the juvenile court did not find to be true, was that either [R.B.] or [S.R.] [was] physically harmed during any domestic violence incident.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale