Poole v. Dembrek CA3
Greg E. Poole (father) appeals from a postjudgment order denying his requests to modify a permanent custody order and grant him a new trial, and ordering him to pay Julie E. Dembrek’s (mother’s) attorney fees as sanctions. Father asks this court to reverse the trial court’s decision. We affirm.
DISCUSSION
The postjudgment order from which father appeals, issued following a contested hearing in the trial court. The appellate record, however, does not include a reporter’s transcript from that hearing, and no reporter is noted in the minute order. Therefore, we treat this as an appeal on the judgment roll. (Allen v. Toten (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1079, 1082-1083 (Allen); Krueger v. Bank of America (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 204, 207.)
The limited record we have establishes that the parties were married in October 2006 and their marriage was dissolved in May 2014. Together, they have one child, born in April 2007.
Comments on Poole v. Dembrek CA3