P. v. Haghighi
Defendant appeals a judgment following his jury conviction on one count of possession for sale of opium, a controlled substance and one count of possession of opium. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by: (1) not giving a unanimity instruction; (2) denying his Penal Code section 1118.1 motion to dismiss the possession for sale count for insufficiency of the evidence; (3) denying his motion to dismiss the possession count for vindictive prosecution; (4) admitting a belatedly disclosed letter into evidence; (5) denying his in limine motion to exclude evidence of his 1963 residential burglary conviction; and (6) committing cumulative error. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Haghighi