P. v. Sparks CA1/5
Donald Duane Sparks appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of perpetrating multiple sex crimes on a child. He contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury, pursuant to CALCRIM No. 1191 (now CALCRIM No. 1191A), that it could consider evidence of Sparks’s prior sexual acts with respect to another child if the uncharged conduct was proven by a preponderance of the evidence. We will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Sparks CA1/5