P. v. Salas CA2/6
Alejandro Salas appeals a sentence the trial court imposed after it revoked his parole for a parole supervision violation. (Pen. Code, § 3000.08.) The court imposed a 120-day period of confinement in the county jail for Salas’s violation and ruled that period would run “consecutively to any time he is serving otherwise.” (Italics added.) We conclude, among other things, that the trial court lacked authority to run a period of confinement for a parole violation consecutively to a sentence on another criminal case. The portion of the judgment imposing a consecutive sentence is stricken; as so modified, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Salas CA2/6