In re Ryan G. CA2/2
The juvenile court exercised dependency jurisdiction over two young boys. The mother of both boys, and the father of one of them, challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the court’s exercise of jurisdiction, and the father also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the removal of his son from his custody. We conclude substantial evidence supports at least one basis for dependency jurisdiction as to each child, as well as the court’s removal order. We accordingly affirm.
Comments on In re Ryan G. CA2/2