legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McIntosh CA4/1
Nehemiah L. McIntosh appeals a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of one count of residential burglary and one count of receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 496, subd. (a).) McIntosh admitted a prior conviction for robbery. (§ 211.) The trial court sentenced McIntosh to eight years for the burglary conviction, and stayed a sentence of four years for receiving stolen property. Based on the prior robbery conviction, the court imposed both a five-year serious felony prior enhancement (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)) and a one-year prior prison term enhancement (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The court stayed the one-year enhancement. On appeal, McIntosh contends the court should have stricken, rather than stayed, the one-year enhancement. The People concede the issue. We agree and remand the matter with directions to strike the one-year prior prison term enhancement and will order the abstract of judgment amended accordingly. We affirm the judgment in all other resp

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale