In re Jasmine G.
Petitioner is the mother of minor, who was detained at approximately two months of age. In a petition for extraordinary writ, mother contends the juvenile court erred by terminating reunification services and scheduling a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to implement a long term plan for minor. Specifically, mother asserts that the juvenile court erred by finding that real party in interest, the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) provided reasonable reunification services.
Court affirmed.
Comments on In re Jasmine G.