In re M.H. CA3
Minor defendant M.H. contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that he committed robbery when he snatched a cell phone from the adult victim’s outstretched hand.
This is indeed a close case. However, as we explain, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution--as the law requires--we find the evidence sufficient. We therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re M.H. CA3