legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Hariri v. Clock CA1/2
Plaintiff Firuze Hariri (Hariri) brought suit against her neighbors Edwin and Nancy Clock (the Clocks), alleging that the landscaping on their property unreasonably obstructed the views from her property in violation of the Tiburon Municipal Code and in breach of a 1983 agreement resolving a previous dispute between the parties. After a bench trial, the trial court agreed and issued an injunction requiring the Clocks to trim or remove various vegetation planted on their property and on an adjacent right-of-way owned by the Town of Tiburon (the Town). After judgment, Hariri sought to recover her expert witness fees on the basis the Clocks had failed to obtain a “more favorable” judgment than her settlement offer under Code of Civil Procedure section 998, as well as the costs of an unsuccessful court ordered mediation which she argued was reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation. The trial entered an order taxing costs and denying Hariri’s requests.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale