legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Enos
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of possession of a firearm by a felon and three counts of carjacking. The jury also found true the allegation that defendant personally used a firearm in committing the carjackings, and defendant admitted he had served seven prior prison terms. Defendant was sentenced to a total state prison term of twenty-four years. Defendant contends that his trial attorney provided constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to pursue a claim-of-right defense on the carjacking charges, and that the court committed various sentencing errors. Court ordered the abstract of judgment modified to reflect the proper presentence custody credits, and to delete reference to the stricken section 667.5, subdivision (b) enhancements. Otherwise, court affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale