legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.R. CA4/1
V.S. (Mother) appeals the denial of her petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and the termination of parental rights over her daughter, D.R., under section 366.26. She argues the juvenile court erred by denying her request for reunification services and by terminating her parental rights. She also contends the court and the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) To the contrary, however, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the court's findings and that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion. We likewise find no error with respect to the ICWA. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale