Wright v. Robinson CA4/2
Plaintiff Linda Wright alleges that her neighbor, defendant Lloyd Robinson, has persecuted her: “I have been threatened, [subjected to] a false citizen[’s] arrest, my property destroyed, my property taken over, my good name slandered . . . .” We caution, however, that Robinson has not yet had an opportunity to tell his side of the story.
Wright obtained a default judgment against Robinson. On Robinson’s motion, the trial court vacated the default judgment. On Wright’s motion, however, the trial court reinstated the default judgment. Finally, on Robinson’s motion, the trial court once again vacated the default judgment.
Wright appeals. We will hold that the trial court’s last order — vacating the default judgment — was supported by substantial evidence. We will also hold that the trial court’s earlier ruling reinstating the default judgment did not preclude it from once again vacating the default judgment. In addition, we will reject Wright’s claim that t
Comments on Wright v. Robinson CA4/2