In re L.E. CA4/2
J.S. (mother) has four children. The two older children (who are both boys) have a different father than the two younger children (who are twin girls). E.E. (father) is the father of the two twin girls. E.B., who is married to R.B. (collectively the B.’s) is the paternal grandfather of the two older boys.
At the time of the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 (section 366.26) hearing below, the twin girls had been in a prospective adoptive placement for about a month and a half. Meanwhile, the B.’s had only just been approved as a prospective adoptive placement for the older boys. The juvenile court refused to place the twin girls with the B.’s. Moreover, it refused to continue the hearing so that the B.’s could be considered as a potential adoptive placement for the twin girls. Instead, it continued the hearing with respect to the older boys and terminated parental rights with respect to the twin girls.
Comments on In re L.E. CA4/2