legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sorensen v. Madoni CA4/3
Believing Charles McHugh and his attorney, Stephen Madoni, conspired to steal his client, Paul Leone, and to convince Leone not to pay outstanding legal bills, appellant and attorney Kerry Sorensen filed suit against the two for intentional interference with contractual relations. Charles and Madoni each filed a special motion to strike the cause of action against them pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP statute). The trial court granted the motions.
Sorensen appeals. He claims the conduct of Charles and Madoni violates certain rules of professional conduct applicable to attorneys practicing law in this state. He also argues their conduct is subject to criminal punishment pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 6128, subdivision (a), which makes it a misdemeanor for an attorney to, inter alia, engage in “deceit or collusion, or consent[] to any deceit or collusion, with [the] intent to deceive the court or any party.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale