legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Grange v. Ward CA2/7
This is the third appeal in this malicious prosecution action. The factual and procedural background of this action and the underlying action is described in detail in La Grange v. Tran (Nov. 12, 2015, B255835) [nonpub. opn.] (La Grange I) and La Grange v. Ward (Jan. 23, 2018, B275459 [nonpub. opn.] (La Grange II).
In this appeal Debra La Grange challenges the trial court’s award of $23,760 in attorneys’ fees to R. Jeffrey Ward, an attorney who represented Tina Tran in the underlying action and who became a defendant in the malicious prosecution action. After the trial court granted Ward’s special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, a ruling we affirmed in La Grange II, the court granted Ward’s motion for attorneys’ fees, although the court awarded Ward much less than he asked for in fees.
La Grange does not dispute Ward prevailed, but argues the amount of the award of attorneys’ fees was unreasonable. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale