legal news


Register | Forgot Password

J.S. v. Superior Court CA1/1
J.S. (mother) petitions this court for extraordinary writ review of a juvenile court order setting a selection-and-implementation hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 for her daughter, 10-year-old A.G. Mother claims that insufficient evidence supports the juvenile court’s findings that there was a substantial risk of detriment to A.G. if returned to her care and that she received reasonable reunification services. We acknowledge that mother loves A.G. and made some progress during the reunification period, but we conclude that substantial evidence supports both challenged findings and therefore deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale