legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.R. CA4/2
A.D., hereafter mother, appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her children, I.R. and L.D. The only issue she raises is the denial of her request to modify the order setting the permanency planning hearing and for six months of reunification services. She contends that because she made the necessary prima facie showing, she was entitled to have an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that she did not make a prima facie showing as to either prong of Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, and we will therefore affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale