P. v. Doolittle CA6
Defendant Kenneth Mark Doolittle was convicted of 20 criminal offenses against multiple victims in connection with an investment scheme. In a previous appeal, we reversed the judgment and remanded with directions to dismiss two counts on limitations grounds and to recalculate the aggregate sum taken from victims, as found for purposes of a sentence enhancement. On remand the trial court again ruled that the aggregate takings met the statutory threshold for the enhancement. I We have concluded that the first four claims of error all fail on the merits, were forfeited in the trial court, or both. Respondent concedes that the abstract of judgment must be corrected as prayed. We will modify the judgment and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Doolittle CA6