P. v. Lopez
Appellant claims there was insufficient evidence to support one of his robbery convictions. Appellant argues that the admission of defendant’s redacted confession violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and constituted Aranda-Bruton error. Appellant also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his severance motion, and that even if it did not abuse its discretion, reversal is still required because gross unfairness resulted. Court affirmed both judgments.
Comments on P. v. Lopez