P. v. Hurth CA2/4
Defendant Jonathan Bernard Hurth appeals from an order denying his petition for a recall of sentence under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, commonly known as “Proposition 36.” Defendant challenges the trial court’s determination that he posed an unreasonable risk of danger to the public and was therefore not eligible for resentencing under Proposition 36. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hurth CA2/4