P. v. Patterson
A jury convicted defendant of first degree murder but deadlocked on the issue of sanity. Following a declaration of mistrial, a second jury found him sane. At the sanity trial, the jury was informed that defendant had been found guilty of premeditated murder and that fact was argued by the prosecutor as bearing on defendant’s sanity. This court affirmed the judgment. California Supreme Court denied review.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, this court found no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. Judgment Affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Patterson