P. v. Cervantes CA2/6
Domingo Anthon Cervantes appeals a judgment the trial court imposed after it revoked his postrelease community supervision (PRCS). (Pen. Code, §§ 3451, 3455.) The court imposed a 180-day period of confinement for Cervantes’s PRCS violation to run “consecutive to any other sentence.” (Italics added.) We conclude, among other things, that the court lacks authority to run a period of confinement for a PRCS violation consecutively to a sentence in another criminal case. The portion of the judgment imposing a consecutive sentence is stricken; as so modified, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Cervantes CA2/6