In re S.L. CA2/6
S.L., a minor, appeals from an order declaring that he remain a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) after the juvenile court found true the allegation that he committed a second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). The court terminated a previous order of home on probation and ordered S.L. to be suitably placed in an open facility.
S.L. contends there was insufficient evidence to prove he aided and abetted a robbery. The Attorney General argues no error, but contends remand is necessary to allow the juvenile court to calculate predisposition custody credits. We remand the case for the limited purpose of calculating S.L.’s predisposition custody credits, but otherwise affirm.
Comments on In re S.L. CA2/6