legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Midence-Allen CA4/3
Ronny Gerardo Midence-Allen appeals from the judgment following his conviction on one count of possession of a controlled substance for sale. (Health & Saf. Code § 11378.)
He contends we must reverse the judgment because the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct when she argued to the jury she had satisfied her burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt by providing only “reasonable” evidence of his guilt. Further, Midence-Allen claims his own trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to the improper argument and request a curative instruction.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale