P. v. Pubill
Defendant appeals his conviction for multiple counts of lewd conduct against two minors. Defendant contends that instructing the jury with the 2002 version of CALJIC No. 2.50.01 permitted the jury to convict him of the charged offenses based on no more than a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that he committed other sex offenses, and that extending the statute of limitations under Penal Code section 803 subdivision (f) violated the ex post facto clause of the federal Constitution. Court found these contentions meritless and affirmed the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Pubill