Kang v. Kim CA2/3
Defendant and appellant Kil J. Kim (Kim) appeals a civil harassment restraining order after hearing that was obtained by plaintiff and respondent Sharlette Kang, who has not filed a respondent’s brief.
Kim’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court abused its discretion in denying her request for a continuance of the hearing on the request for a civil harassment restraining order. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm.
By way of background, the trial court issued a temporary restraining order on May 25, 2017. On June 16, 2017, when the matter was called for hearing on the petition, Kim’s counsel advised the court that Kim was not present due to her incarceration for allegedly violating the temporary restraining order, and counsel requested a continuance. The court granted the request and continued the matter to July 7, 2017.
Comments on Kang v. Kim CA2/3