In re R.H. CA2/8
Father appeals the juvenile court’s disposition order removing his infant son from his custody. Father argues that the court should have ordered informal supervision and that there were less restrictive means available to safeguard the child short of removal. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in ordering formal supervision because father did not request informal supervision and he continued to display poor parenting judgment. We dismiss the portion of the appeal about the removal order as moot.
Comments on In re R.H. CA2/8