In re E..M. CA1/4
E.M. (Minor) appeals from an order of wardship (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) entered after the juvenile court sustained allegations that, when Minor was between the ages of 12 and 15, he committed three sex offenses against two daughters of his father’s girlfriend, R.S. and K.M. The court placed Minor on probation, in the custody of his parents, under various terms and conditions.
On appeal, Minor contends reversal is required because (1) the juvenile court failed to meet its obligations under the deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) statutory scheme described in section 790 et seq.; (2) the juvenile court prejudicially erred in excluding Minor’s father from the courtroom when the sisters testified during his jurisdictional hearing; and (3) the juvenile court’s order sustaining the allegations of the petition lacked adequate evidentiary support. Minor also contends the juvenile court erred in imposing certain probation conditions.
Comments on In re E..M. CA1/4