In re Hazel G. CA5
Appellant Daniel G. is the biological father of now four-year-old Hazel G. On October 31, 2017, the juvenile court terminated his parental rights as to Hazel (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) and he appealed. After reviewing the juvenile court record, Daniel’s court-appointed counsel informed this court she could find no arguable issues to raise on Daniel’s behalf. This court granted Daniel leave to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844 (Phoenix H.).)
Daniel filed a letter in which he objects to the termination of his parental rights, claims his trial attorney was ineffective and he did not know he could visit Hazel and denies refusing to attend a court hearing.
We conclude Daniel failed to address the termination proceedings or set forth a good cause showing that any arguable issue of reversible error arose from the termination hearing.
Comments on In re Hazel G. CA5