Bramlette v. Wilbur
Appellant appeals from a civil harassment protective order issued against him in favor of respondents. Appellant contends that the trial judge (1) erred in refusing his request to continue the trial, (2) incorrectly denied his “right to offer relevant evidence,” (3) wrongly refused Wilbur’s request to recall a witness, (4) and should have recused himself from conducting the hearing. Court held that these contentions lacked merit. Order Affirmed.
Comments on Bramlette v. Wilbur