legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Adam W. CA5
John W. is the father of Adam and Levi, now six and five years old, respectively. In September 2016, the juvenile court established a permanent plan of legal guardianship for the children after John failed to reunify with them. On October 3, 2017, at a postpermanency plan review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.3), the court terminated its dependency jurisdiction over the children but retained its jurisdiction over them as wards of the legal guardianship.
John appealed from the juvenile court’s October 3, 2017, ruling. After reviewing the juvenile court record, John’s court-appointed counsel informed this court he could find no arguable issues to raise on John’s behalf. This court granted John leave to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.)
John submitted a letter requesting reinstatement of reunification services so he can learn more about his son

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale