P. v. Medina CA4/3
Defendant Alejandro Perez Medina appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of committing a lewd act on a child under 14 years old, oral copulation with a child under 14 years old, a lewd act on a 15-year-old child who was at least 10 years younger than defendant, and oral copulation with a child under 16 years of age by a person over 21 years of age. Defendant contends that with regard to his conviction for committing a lewd act on a 15-year-old child, the trial court erred by instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 1112 because it contained language he contends incorrectly “absolved the jurors from finding that [he] had the statutorily required lewd intent” when he touched his victim in the commission of that offense.
Comments on P. v. Medina CA4/3