P. v. Jurado CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Richard Jurado (defendant) appealed from the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under Proposition 47. We affirmed the trial court’s denial of the petition on the ground that defendant’s conviction for taking or driving a vehicle in violation of Vehicle Code section 10851 was not a theft offense eligible for resentencing under Proposition 47. Defendant sought review in the California Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court transferred the matter back to this court for reconsideration in light of its decision People v. Page (2017) 3 Cal.5th 1175 (Page). We issued a notice to the parties inviting them to submit letter briefs addressing the effect, if any, the Supreme Court’s decision Page should have on this case. Upon consideration of the parties’ letter briefs and the Page decision, we again affirm the order denying defendant’s petition, but do so without prejudice to consideration of a new petition providing evidence of defendant
Comments on P. v. Jurado CA2/2