legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Long CA4/2
“At the evidentiary hearing on the order to show cause, Dr. Hua estimated that the victim died “long before 1:20 a.m.” Hua explained that his time of death estimation was based upon the deputy coroner making his observations at 5:03 a.m. The record reflects Gomes arrived at the crime scene at 5:03 a.m. and that he recorded the room temperature at 6:11 a.m. A police report reflecting that the people removing the victim’s body from the crime scene were at the crime scene from 6:57 a.m. to 7:13 a.m., which indicated Gomes observed the victim’s body between 5:03 a.m. and 6:57 a.m.”
Is modified to read as follows:
“At the evidentiary hearing on the order to show cause, Dr. Hua estimated that the victim died “long before 1:20 a.m.” Hua explained that his time of death estimation was based upon the paramedics’ observation of rigor at 2:20 a.m. and the deputy coroner’s observation of almost fixed lividity at 5:03 a.m.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale