legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.D. CA2/1
S.B. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s denial of her request for a continuance for a contested disposition hearing; and the juvenile court’s order removing her children A.D., age five, and A.P., age two, from her custody pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 361, subdivision (c), on the ground that the order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying mother’s request for a continuance, and that there was substantial evidence to support the court’s order removing the children from her custody. We therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale