legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Paige CA1/1
A jury convicted defendant Leondre Paige of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) and also found he personally used and discharged a firearm causing great bodily injury (§ 12022.53, subds. (b)–(d)). On appeal, he contends multiple statements the prosecutor made during the course of the trial constituted misconduct, or alternatively that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to those comments. He also contends the trial court erred by failing to conduct a Marsden hearing. In supplemental briefing, defendant further asks that his sentence be reversed and the matter be remanded to permit the trial court to exercise its discretion as to whether to strike the firearm enhancement pursuant to Senate Bill No. 620. The Attorney General agrees section 12022.53 applies retroactively and that the matter should be remanded. We affirm the judgment, but remand for the trial court to consider resentencing under amended section 12022.53, subdivision (h).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale