O.C. v. House of Air CA1/2
The trial court granted summary judgment for the owner and operator of a trampoline park in this personal injury action, brought by a minor who broke her ankle while jumping there and by her grandmother who saw the incident and claimed emotional distress damages. The court concluded the minor and her grandmother’s claims were barred as a matter of law on two alternative grounds: by the terms of a written release of liability the child’s grandfather had signed on the child’s behalf, and by the doctrine of primary assumption of risk. Both plaintiffs now appeal.
We affirm. It is unnecessary to address the parties’ contentions regarding the scope and effect of the liability waiver, because appellants have not met their burden of demonstrating the trial court erred in applying the primary assumption of risk doctrine to bar their claims.
Comments on O.C. v. House of Air CA1/2