Marriage of Wong CA4/3
On April 2, 2018, appellant filed separate notices of appeal purporting to appeal from orders entered on August 18, 2017 and September 15, 2017. According to the notices of appeal, the September 2017 order “modified” the August 2017 order, and both orders were in turn “modified” by a January 31, 2018 order. Appellant asserts all three orders are appealable as postjudgment orders (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(2)) and as orders granting (or refusing to dissolve) an injunction (§ 904.1, subd. (a)(6).)
The gap between the entry of the August and September 2017 orders and the filing of the notices of appeal was significant — 227 and 199 days, respectively. Assuming for the sake of argument that these were appealable orders, the notices of appeal were untimely. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.104, 8.108; see Anderson v. Chikovani (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1397, 1401
Comments on Marriage of Wong CA4/3