P. v. Wiess CA1/4
Defendant Cameron Allen Wiess appeals a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of second degree murder and attempted murder and rejected his claim that he was not guilty by reason of insanity. He contends that the trial court committed instructional error, that the sanity finding is not supported by substantial evidence, and that his sentences should run concurrently rather than consecutively. We shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Wiess CA1/4