Goraya v. Stephens CA5
Mohammed Goraya appeals from the trial court’s order vacating an arbitration award in his favor. On November 17, 2016, after soliciting a letter brief from Goraya regarding the timeliness of the appeal, this court issued an order deeming the appeal timely. After reviewing the record on appeal, however, it is apparent that the contentions in Goraya’s letter brief were inaccurate and mistaken. Having again reviewed the question, which the parties analyzed in their appellate briefs, we are compelled to conclude that the appeal was, in fact, filed late. We lack jurisdiction to consider the merits and must dismiss the appeal.
Comments on Goraya v. Stephens CA5