Li v. Chiu CA1/3
This appeal is from a judgment setting aside a fraudulent transfer of real property that defendant Demas Yan made to his relatives in order to avoid paying a money judgment owed to plaintiff Charles Li. Yan and the other defendants challenge the judgment, arguing the trial court erred in granting motions in limine that they claim had the effect of preventing the relatives to whom Yan transferred the property from presenting evidence of their equitable interest in the property. In addition, they claim the court erred in awarding attorney fees against all defendants on the ground the fees were incurred by Li to enforce his previous money judgment against Yan. They contend that defendants who were not parties to the earlier action between Li and Yan cannot be liable for attorney fees incurred in enforcing the judgment against Yan absent an express finding that they conspired with Yan to evade enforcing the judgment.
Comments on Li v. Chiu CA1/3