Aranda v. County of Los Angeles CA2/3
Plaintiff and appellant Hilda Aranda (Aranda) appeals a judgment following a grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, defendant and respondent County of Los Angeles (the County), and two of her former supervisors, Kelly Saldivar (Saldivar) and Tatiana Moskova (Moskova) (sometimes collectively referred to as the County).
The issues presented include whether certain actions taken by the County amounted to adverse employment actions, whether Aranda raised a triable issue that she was denied certain positions on account of her age, and whether conduct by the County occurring outside the limitations period is actionable under the continuing violations doctrine.
We reject Aranda’s claims of error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Aranda v. County of Los Angeles CA2/3