P. v. Hart
Defendant appeals from a jury conviction finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance transportation of a controlled substance and driving without a license. Following his conviction, the trial court found true the allegations that defendant suffered a prior conviction of a serious or violent felony, five prior convictions for which he served prison terms, and a prior conviction of a drug-related offense. On appeal, defendant claims error in the admission of irrelevant and prejudicial evidence and in the imposition of the upper term sentence. Court rejected his claims of error and affirmed the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hart