Ayoub v. Candee CA4/1
Appellants and respondents are property owners/managers of adjoining rural properties near Temecula. Their disputes concern three alleged road easements burdening appellants' property, and activities related to the use or preclusion of use of these easements. Both sets of parties brought complaints and cross-complaints seeking to resolve the disputes.
After the parties waived their jury trial rights, the court conducted a seven-day trial. In the first phase, appellants presented evidence on their claims against respondents. At the conclusion of appellants' case, the court granted respondents' motion for judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8. The court found appellants' testimony was not credible and they did not meet their burden to prove their claims against respondents.
Comments on Ayoub v. Candee CA4/1