P. v. Harris CA2/3
Defendant Kelin Harris challenges his sentence on the ground the trial court misunderstood and abused its discretion by failing to dismiss his strike priors. We conclude the court neither misunderstood nor abused its discretion. We also conclude, however, that the matter should be remanded for the court to exercise its discretion on whether to strike the imposed firearm enhancements under newly enacted Senate Bill No. 620 (2017–2018 Reg. Sess.).
Comments on P. v. Harris CA2/3