P. v. Atkins CA4/2
Defendant and appellant Raymond Charles Atkins, Jr., appeals from the superior court’s ruling denying without prejudice his Proposition 47 petition. Defendant relies on People v. Romanowski (2017) 2 Cal.5th 903 (Romanowski), which held, after the trial court ruled on his petition, that courts may consider evidence of stolen items’ value in an illicit market when determining whether the theft involved an item with a value of $950 or less. The police report includes a statement by defendant to a police officer that he paid $50 for all of the stolen items he possessed.
Comments on P. v. Atkins CA4/2