Bagumyan v. Brandies CA2/3
Plaintiff and appellant Henry Bagumyan (Bagumyan) appeals a judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Irene Dorothy Brandies (Brandies) following a defense verdict.
Bagumyan contends the trial court erred in denying his Batson/Wheeler motions regarding defense counsel’s peremptory challenges which eliminated two prospective jurors of Armenian descent, and abused its discretion in certain evidentiary rulings with respect to the parties’ respective experts.
As explained below, we perceive no error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Bagumyan v. Brandies CA2/3