In re Alexander M. CA5
Alexander M. appeals from a true finding on a robbery allegation adjudicated against him in juvenile court. He argues the juvenile court prejudicially erred in admitting a witness’s prior statement at his jurisdiction hearing. We agree and reverse. Alexander further argues the evidence underlying the true finding on the robbery allegation is insufficient, barring retrial. We disagree and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Comments on In re Alexander M. CA5