P. v. Carbajal CA5
Daniel Christopher Carbajal challenges his convictions for felony obstructing or resisting an officer by use of force, carrying a loaded firearm in public without being the registered owner, unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, and unlawful possession of ammunition by a felon. He asks for independent review of the trial court’s Pitchess inquiry. He also contends his convictions must be reversed because the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Finally, citing People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665, he argues reversal is mandated because of the prejudicial effect of inadmissible testimony from the People’s gang expert. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Carbajal CA5